Cement is one of the
most attractive sectors, particularly for long-term player, because they have
pretty good fundamental. There are only three cement companies that listed on
the IDX, and three of them has quite decent performance. They are Semen Gresik (SMGR),
Indocement (INTP), and Holcim Indonesia (SMCB). How did their performance on First
Quarter 2010? And which company with good stock to collect? Let’s see then.
Based on its assets’
size, SMGR is the largest one with its assets of Rp13.8 trillion, followed
by INTP with Rp13.6 trillion, and SMCB with Rp7.3 trillion. You maybe confused; isn’t SMCB
that appears more popular than the other two? Why it has smaller asset? Indeed,
SMCB ofter advertised their products in various media, including television, it is because their
target market is invidual consumer; in other words, they retail their product.
As for SMGR and INTP, they engaged in more major project such as building
construction and public facilities. For example, SMGR supplies 300 tons of
cement for Suramadu Bridge project in East Java. If later Selat Sunda Bridge
project is deal, then the bidders for the supply of cement will not stray from
Indocement or Semen Gresik.
That’s how when judge
from the assets size. Judging by its market cap, INTP is bigger than SMGR, with
Rp55.2 trillion of market
cap, while SMGR only has Rp50.1 trillion. What about SMCB? It has Rp16.1 trillion of market
cap. Does it mean that INTP’s performance is better than SMGR? If you look at
the improvement on last First Quarter 2010, then the answer is yes. INTP
recorded its improvement in sales up to 16.6%, operational profit of 31.5%, and
net profit of 56.4%. On the other hand, SMGR only recorded its sales
improvement of 0.6%, operational profit of 16.8%, and net profit of 17.8%. Nevertheless, SMGR is
slightly better in terms of profitability ratio on First Quarter 2010, where
SMGR recorded ROE of 29.4%, while INTP is only 27.4%. SMGR’s sales measure also
greater than INTP. SMGR recorded its sales of Rp3.2 trillion, while INTP
is only Rp2.6 trillion.
Then how about SMCB?
This company has already started to show positive performance by recording its
net profit of Rp205 billion on First Quarter 2010, after experiencing loss
Rp77 billion on the same period of previous year. Past performance of
SMCB is not as good as INTP and SMGR. That's why even though the size of its
assets reached about half of the assets of INTP and SMGR, but its market cap is
only a third of them. The company that previosly known as Semen Cibinong
(hence the ticker is SCMB, not HLCM), began to show good performance after
acquired by Holcim, one of the largest cement companies in the world from Swiss. If only SMCB is able
to maintain their performance, maybe someday they can be as equal to INTP and
SMGR.
Now, let us check their
stock price.
Today’s stock price
resulted in PER of: SMGR 15.6 times, INTP 17.6 times, and SMCB 19.4 times.
Currently, SMGR’s stock is the most undervalue one between the three, because
in the last two months, the investors are prefer to collect INTP and SMCB due
to the performance improvement that is better than SMGR, so that the rise in
stock price of SMGR is not as big as INTP and SMCB, particularly since mid last
February. Since February, SMGR is constant and only up and down occasionally, while
INTP and SMCB keep moving up. But the impact, when IHSG is beaten up by correction
throughout the month of May, the price of SMCB and INTP is also affected and
corrected, while SMGR is not affected.
That's why I would
recommend SMGR for long term. In the near future, SMGR may has difficulties to
climb up, but is very safe for the 6 to12-month choice, because the stock
movement is very stable. But if you can stand to see red arrows in Yahoo
Finance, INTP and SMCB can also be collected anyway, because their
fundamentally
are equally good, at least for now. You might want to consider collecting INTP
for long term if in the second quarters later they were able to record an
improvement performance that is equal to the present.
SMGR
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: AAA
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: AAA
Stock rating on 8,450: A
INTP
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: AAA
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: AAA
Stock rating on 15,000:
A
SMCB
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: A
Performance rating on First Quarter 2010: A
Stock rating on 2,100:
BBB
Original
article was written on June 1st, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment